There is a lot of inequality going around at the moment, has been going on for a while really but has definitely been getting worse recently. There’s the local level sort of inequality that people get hung up on, like footballers wages compared to the supporters wages, but then there is the epic global type of inequality that the people who get hung up on footballers wages don’t seem to care so much about. Check out some of this shit:
https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2017-01-16/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world
http://www.forbes.com/beta/forbes-400/
http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?30-SUBSCRIBE-NOW
I saw this comment on Reddit in response to the Rothschild article above which I think is a reasonably concise statement of some of the issues with dealing with these cunts:
You don’t get rich by playing by the rules, and these people are very rich.
You can’t tax them because they’ll either find loopholes, or leave the country if they can’t find one. You can’t freeze their accounts because that’d damage too much of the overall economy and cause legal controversy. You can’t investigate them for illegal activity because they’ll bribe the people in charge.
Really you can’t take their money. Not without meticulous plans that work against their interests. You have to beat them at their own game to win, a game they have the power to change the rules of at will, a game that they’ve been playing for years and beaten everybody else along the way.
So where is this situation heading? Does the political process really offer a solution to this problem?
Looking to the UK specifically, the problem of land ownership inequality has apparently been hanging around in its current form since Norman times: