Originally posted by @Chertsey-Saint
Not at all, all I was doing was linking to an Independent article…I dont care if you don’t think it’s a valid poll, it’s a poll done
At least be real, Cherts. All you were doing was providing a counter-thread to the Tories in trouble? thread I started last night. Nowt wrong with that, but you started off with rather more opinion based off considerably less substantiation.
You provided a link, set the title and had a one-line opinion about how Labour were crap because of this one Indy article.
in the paper that has been most complimentary about the new guard. That’s my only point. I’d like to know what assumptions you think I’m making…
If I decided to go on some mass diatribe about how this is proof that Corbyn is going to poll lower than any post war Labour politician then fair enough, but all I said was from people I know this is pretty accurate.
I know what assumptions you’re making.
Assumption #1 - The Indy is a Corbyn ally
Surprisingly from their only real press ally as well…
Incompetent Labour party
Reality: The Indy never endorsed Corbyn. Only the Morning Star and Daily Record did.
Assumption #2 - The people I meet are representative of general society
Not really a surprise judging by the general sentiment I’ve encountered.
Assumption #3 - pap isn’t critical of Corbyn, or any of his policies.
I love how you will bend over backwards to defend him, anything negative said about Corbyn etc.
Assumption #4 - that when losing debate, one can somehow “win” that debate by insulting your opponent and then claiming that your opponent is stifling debate
The dismissive way you deal with anything that doesn’t got with your sycophantic rhetoric means that people become stifled (see Verbal/Lou) and then don’t bother.