I’m gonna secretly disasemble a christmas cracker and insert the most horrific, offensive joke I can find. It’ll be like Christmas Russian Roulette! Who will get it, my mum, Uncle Pete from Lowestoft, or maybe one of the young Children? It will be v.excitement!
It’ll be like:
Q. What do you say to a man who creeps into little girl’s bedrooms in the middle of the night and empties his sack?
A. Hi, Uncle Pete. How are things at 23 Sycamore Close, Lowestoft?
I propose paedoPhil. It’s got to be exactly like that tho, you need both a small p and a big P because Symbolism. And Phil rather than phile because he has been v.quiet on this subject which is Suspicious.
One of the things I’ve noticed about running a forum is that the enterprise gets compared to a pub, particularly when someone has acted like a wanker. “It’s a pub, innit? People do mad shit down the pub”.
Bantz is definitely acceptable in a pub. I reckon you’d stand a good chance of getting filled in if you called someone a “fucking nonce” down the pub.
I lived in Outer Circle for 3 years and didn’t hear anything like it.
Mind you, the term “paedo” wouldn’t have been used when I was around, but didn’t hear nonce either.
The first time I ever heard the term was after a girl from our estate was spirited out of school and her father arrested after years of abuse. Perhaps the humour table is different a couple of miles to the west, but it really wasn’t a laughing matter on the Flower Estates.
Being a parent is a profound privilege. Abusing kids is imo, the lowest of the low. They have limited faculties to process the information they’ve been given, and often, fuck all support even if they do speak to somebody.
A week and a bit ago, Bazza’s missus gave birth to a nipper. We all celebrated. Cherts posted something like all trolling aside, well done. Less than a fortnight later, Cherts is calling Bazza a nonce with zero proof. It’s perhaps the worst intentioned post I’ve ever seen on a forum. Even TSW’s Hypo, when he made the same baseless charges over there, developed enough insta-shame to go crawling to a mod to remove his disgrace.
It needed sorting out, it was indeed well out of order.
Along with the many responses and posts that led the non-dynamic duo to that disgraceful exchange.
Two of them locked horns, both posted insults, both bored everyone else shitless, both went into the Reichenbach Falls - and one was run over by the forum lifeboat as it rushed to rescue the other, before he even got his shoes wet.
One of the things I’ve noticed about running a forum is that the enterprise gets compared to a pub, particularly when someone has acted like a wanker. “It’s a pub, innit? People do mad shit down the pub”.
Bantz is definitely acceptable in a pub. I reckon you’d stand a good chance of getting filled in if you called someone a “fucking nonce” down the pub.
I wish ppl would stop saying that Chertsey called Barry a paedophile like he’s some kind of sociopath. He didn’t call him a paedophile. Well he did, that’s exactly what he did, but it wasn’t like… what point am I trying to make here?
Let’s put it this way. No-one who read it would think that Chertsey thought that Barry was a paedophile. We’re better than that. We’re not pap’s cunt mates from the pub, or whatever he’s going on about. It was the normal kind of post that people do when they’re a) joking b) trying to make some wider point or c) looking to get a rise. I wouldn’t be offence at all to be on the end of that kind of post. I don’t think Barry was either tbh, I think he was keen to grasp an opportunity to win the Higher Ground, which is actually what pap’s mates are doing when they’re like “Don’t you call me a fkn Nonce!”.
If someone was going round earnestly trying to persuade people I was paedophile, I suppose I might be offence. You know, if someone was seriously making out like I was on register for downloading child porn, I suppose that would be Quite Bad, but that weren’t the case here. It was just escalating tit-for-tat, and as such I think the normal criticism from other posters, which cherts immediately received for stepping over the line, answered the fact.
Pap’s other concern, that cherts will continue to make a nuisance of himself on the frm by fighting with Barry and calling people paedophiles don’t bother me at all. I like the dramas! I’ve spent two solid days on this subject! I mean, this and trolling pap.
You saying that Pap is twisting what was actually said to be a stubborn knob and get something to fit the actions he has already taken or a stance he has already made?
That doesn’t sound like… oh no, you are right. As you were.
Oh I dunno, I was just trying a different angle of attack. I think people are too precious about Things in general. I’m reading talk of slander and libels, like you know, all the paedo talk has devalued the Barry Sanchez anonymous avatar brand or something. Seems fkn mental to me.
You saying that Pap is twisting what was actually said to be a stubborn knob and get something to fit the actions he has already taken or a stance he has already made? That doesn’t sound like… oh no, you are right. As you were.
You can read it yourself. It’s all still there.
I fundamentally disagree with Bear on the issue too. This site has stats that far outweigh the number of people that actively post. Cherts had all the opportunity in the world to put that wrong right, if indeed he was misconstrued.
I don’t think he was, and I don’t have a great deal respect for faux cluelessness either, especially to sate such superficial demons.