This poll refers to the Les Reed interview back in May when he still expected Koeman to stay and such. I never polished it up properly because I was out of town when it was release, my secretary was too busy to type it up for a week and I was too busy to correct it properly for several more weeks. By the time I might have had time, it seemed too badly out of date.
0 voters
I posted it under the title:
“The Completely Unproofed and Long Out-of-Date Transcript of Les Reed’s May 26, 2016 Interview”
Found here:
I had a look at your blog and the entry. I thought it was an interview you had conducted but it turns out it’s a saintsfc interview that is on their YouTube channel. This leads me to my question…why on earth have you transcribed that? I can just watch it. Maybe I’m missing the point…well clearly I am, so can you help a simple minded soul understand the point of transcribing it?
Why do you think I said no Fats?
I transcribe them for three reasons. It is easier to reference a written document to find specific things, two most people read faster than they can watch a video, and, three, people seem to like them. Whenever I post transcripts of Les Reed interviews they get lots of page hits. The fact that I didn’t have time to polish this one and, therefore, let it become out of date is why I hesitated to post it. Thus, I asked if I should.
Down-voted for being fat.
You down voted me for asking a genuine question? Fair enough.
Nope, genuinely for being fat.