So pretty much everyone is aware of the couple involved. So why is this being pursued still.
google-links-celebrity-injunction-couple-threesome
-
- Waste of time
-
- Needed to protect celebs private lives
0 voters
Itâs privacy for sale, isnât it? Nice if youâve got the dough to be able to afford it.
Youâre right though. At this stage itâs just there to stop anyone from publishing what is already known.
3 Likes
I guess they have a place when the press are being genuinely intrusive, however if Ryan Giggs wants to stop the publication of a story about boning his brothers missus, then no.
1 Like
RIP Papsweb.
1 Like
Anyway, Iâve missed this. who boned who
Is this in the public interest? If it wasnt a âcelebrityâ would anyone give a fuck? Maybe Sun readers I supposed.
Leave itâŚjust LEAVE IT! âŚand anyway we havenât been Swingers for years. 
4 Likes
I donât think any of us want to see our founder and hero dragged away, beaten up and bankrupted by legal cases over the naming of individuals, so letâs just leave it there.
Other than to say that Pap should check the gale warnings in future - it seems to me heâs lived his life wearing sandals in the wind.
Celbrities love the public when theyâre being adulated but when they do something wrong they donât want the public to know, you canât have it both ways Mr Dwight!!!
Pap, am I allowed to do that or will you be incarcerated for life??
I do not think it really is in the public interest in this couples case. Who slept with who isnât that interesting. I hear enough stuff at work to write a soap opera!
Maybe there is a need for us to know at certain times. Iâve not read much about it but understand said couple had an open relationship. The other couple then wanted to sell the story. If you are off having additional people involved in your relationship maybe pick your partners better?
Anyway probably best not to say who we think it is. Otherwise pap will have a large legal bill. 
Iâll probably be skinter than Iâd like for something I donât actually give a fuck about on a detail level.
I donât care who is fucking who for what reason.
In the abstract, it does seem rather a shame that so much of our justice system is tied up with it, and that weâve got a two-tier privacy system.
2 Likes
Am I the only one who:
a) has no idea what celeb story this is refering to
b) who the celebs are
c) really does not give a flying fuck about who it is or who they a fuckingâŚ
also who/what the fuck are the kardashians and should I need to know?
As for privissy laws - should be a basic human right, unles sreally in the public interest. Eg. politician shagging secretary - none of my business, Politician who claims âback to basics and spouts moralistic shiteâ shagging secretary is in public inerest
Celebs doing anything is not in public interest - there are some sad fucks who think its important⌠and sadly a lot of them , but they are all cunts so why worry about they think
Ultimately, its a âpeople have sexâ story - big fucking deal⌠
5 Likes
Originally posted by @areloa-grandee
also who/what the fuck are the kardashians and should I need to know?
Thatâs a bit specist, if you donât mind me saying. While there have been some right bastards, theyâre not all the same.
Damar! Hero of Cardassia!
1 Like
For me it isnât a question of it being in the public interest, itâs that the justification for the injunction was that it would embarrass their kids. Iâd suggest possibly refraining from that sort of behaviour in the first place if your kids are your primary concern.
2 Likes
Somewhat symplistic âhypoâ - Adults doing Adult things does not make you a bad parent, and our perpsectivesonsuch things tend to be clouded by cultural and religious references, so matter how deepy buried, asopposed to our natural biological ones⌠If anything, ensuring your children are not exposed to all behaviours until tehy are old enough to understand is a sign of better parenting?
I just dont think we need to know who is shagging who, seriously, it is of nobodies business
2 Likes
Princess Diana??
Ultimately I couldnât give a flying fuck what some shite âcelebrityâ is doing with their lives. Simply donât care. They are no-one. No more so than all the members of this forum, than my family, my friends. They are human beings, and no more special than anyone else.
I fucking hate celebrity for the sake of celebrity. Sure, youâre gonna be famous if youâre world-class (or at least very fucking good) at what you do. Be that playing football, acting, fucking up countries, or whatever. But I do not give a fuck about your (their) personal life, and it saddens me that there is sooo much utter âcelebrityâ dross on TV, in the papers etc. Weâre fucking saturated by it.
But â if you go out of your way to court such publicity, and lap it all up, the fame, the adulation, the autograph huntersâŚ
then you effectively put yourself on a pedestal. Canât have it both ways. I donât agree we should âpryâ into peopleâs private lives â but when they go out of their ways to flaunt themselves in the media seeking public affections and chasing fame and red carpet treatment at Film premiers and all that glitzy bullshit â then they have to take the otherside of that coin when the shit hits the fan.
For me, our press should be free. I know it isnât, and the reality is - it is tightly controlled for the most part (when powerful people do not want us to know certain things) â but you canât live the high life and lap up the media limelight when it suits, and then threaten a life ruining âCarter-Ruckingâ to anyone who says things that you donât like about you when it comes back and bites you on the aris.
2 Likes
The obsidian order means there is no need for super injunctions anyway - they instantly quosh and stories relating to Guls getting together and playing â sticky spoonâ
1 Like