How to start a match in 3rd place and end it in a relegation scrap - consolidate all of your appalling performances into one manageable and damaging session!
What a dismal and embarrassing display.
They should all be punched in the face.
50-8. Get punching RB
Hey, at least they got 50 runs…
56/9
Surrey need 113 more with…all wickets in hand.
So we produce a monumentally bad batting performance on the day that Hants announce Carberry is leaving
That’s good, less points Somerset get the better
Wankers
Even the ECB are rubbing it in
Surrey 40/2, need another 102 runs
Surrey now 66/2. Need 76 more.
Monumentally awful. To come over all statto this is only the second time that Hants have made their opponents follow on and lost. And of course the other time was also against Essex, in 1992
Worst of all - I have to say ‘come on Surrey’!
93/3 need 49 more
Surrey won (only took 32 overs to score 146 and had six wickets in hand). We are safe.
FFS I did not expect to be saying this at the start of play today
Don’t think we’re safe - need 12 more points to be mathematically above Somerset
Somerset playing Middx (just three above us). We have Warks. We should be safe.
Did you REALLY have to say that?
Pos | Team | Played | Won | Lost | Drawn | Tied | N/R | Bat (Bonus) | Bowl (Bonus) | Deduct | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Essex | 13 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 37 | 0 | 228 |
2 | Surrey | 13 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 31 | 0 | 159 |
3 | Lancashire | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 35 | 0 | 156 |
4 | Yorkshire | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 32 | 0 | 145 |
5 | Middlesex | 13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 34 | 2 | 143 |
6 | Hampshire | 13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 33 | 0 | 140 |
7 | Somerset | 13 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 36 | 0 | 127 |
8 | Warwickshire | 13 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 28 | 0 | 78 |